Dissolution of Your Business Entity
by
Brian P. McMahon, Esq.
There are primarily four reasons
why a business entity is dissolved.
These are: 1.) retirement of an
owner(s) with no plan for succession; 2.) as part of estate administration upon
the death of an owner; 3.) a breakdown in the relationship between multiple
owners; and, 4.) creditor/financial issues.
Although the fundamental process is the same regardless the reason, there
are unique requirements depending on the circumstances involving not only
knowledge of business law, but estate laws as well.
In this article “business entity” is intended to refer to corporations, limited liability companies, professional limited liability
companies and other forms of owning a business.
There are two ways to “dissolve”
a business entity, namely, “informally” and “formally.”
Informal dissolution is not so much a process as it is a decision to let
the business entity “die a natural death” by simply informing the State of
Michigan and the Internal Revenue Service that the entity is ceasing its
operations. Formal dissolution is
when an actual “Certificate of Dissolution” is filed with the State of
Regardless of whether the
business entity is informally or formally dissolved, the company needs to go
through a process called “winding up.”
During the “winding up” process the assets of the business entity are
marshaled and liquidated, debts are paid and the remaining assets, normally
money, are distributed to the shareholders/members.
However, the decision whether the business entity will be informally or
formally dissolved needs to be made before beginning the actual “winding up”
process.
Perhaps
the most important factor in choosing between informal dissolution and formal
dissolution is whether a shareholder/member will receive a distribution (e.g.
money) as a result of the dissolution of the business entity.
Another factor, relating to the first, is whether there are creditors of
the business entity, including state and federal tax liability.
Informal dissolution may
be appropriate if a Shareholder/member will not receive any distributions
and there are no creditors; or, a Shareholder/member will receive
a distribution and there is a very high degree of confidence that there
are no creditors. Formal
dissolution should be considered if a Shareholder/member will receive a
distribution and there is a low degree of confidence that there are no
creditors. Formal dissolution is
highly recommended if Shareholder/member will receive a distribution and
there are creditors whose claim is unliquidated (i.e. the exact amount is
unknown) or whose claim is disputed by the business entity.
The formal dissolution process
involves, in very general terms:
·
Vote of shareholders/members to dissolve the business entity.
·
Filing of a Certificate of Dissolution.
·
Notice to Known Creditors (requiring creditors to submit a claim within a
certain time period).
·
Notice to Unknown Creditors. This is
accomplished by publishing Notice of Dissolution in a newspaper of general
circulation in the county where the business entity is located.
·
Obtaining a Tax Clearance from the State of
·
Filing required Internal Revenue Service documents.
Once the time period for
creditors to submit a claim has passed and all of the business entity’s assets
have been liquidated, distributions are made first to creditors and then to
shareholders/members.
The benefit of informal
dissolution is that it is less time consuming and it is less expensive than
formal dissolution. The benefit of
formal dissolution is that the MBCA provides that if the statutory formal
dissolution process is followed, shareholders/members that receive distributions
will be protected from liability for claims made by creditors after the formal
dissolution process is complete. If
the formal dissolution process is not followed (i.e. the business entity is
informally dissolved when it should have been formally dissolved), a
shareholder/member may be liable to a creditor up to the amount of the
distribution received by that shareholder/member.
It is important to speak to a
business attorney before deciding whether to informally or formally dissolve a
business entity. There are technical
compliance issues that if not followed can result in “issues” even years after
the business entity ceased operations.
Footnote: The issue of bankruptcy is
outside the scope of this article.
However, for all practical purposes, the bankruptcy process is similar to a
formal dissolution. An important
practical difference is that assets can typically be sold for more during the
“winding up” process than if sold as a result of the bankruptcy process (i.e.
“fire sale”). Therefore, if the
“writing is on the wall” it is best to begin, and hopefully finish, the
dissolution process before bankruptcy is the only option and/or a creditor
forces the business entity into bankruptcy.
Contact Brian P.
McMahon
Troff, Petzke & Ammeson Home
Page