|
THE IMPORTANCE OF ORGANIZED RECORD RETENTION
THE
FOLLOWING IS A TEST OF YOUR EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
SYSTEM:
First,
start a timer.
Next,
as quickly as you can, retrieve the following:
(1)
Your last three federal income tax returns;
(2)
The deed to your home, your most recent property tax bill,
your mortgage, and evidence of the present balance of the
indebtedness secured by that mortgage;
(3)
Your savings account books, your checkbook registers, your
certificates of deposit and your most recent monthly bank
account statements;
(4)
Your stock certificates and the most recent quarterly
statements in regard to your brokerage accounts and mutual
funds;
(5)
All policies of insurance on your life, home, and motor
vehicles; and
(6)
All of your unpaid bills.
Next,
stop the timer. How did you do?
For
those of you who are satisfied that you "passed" the test I
urge you to re-take the test during the height of your next
bout of the flu or after having been sleep deprived or heavily
medicated for several days. Will you do as well?
Finally,
ask your spouse or the other person upon whom you would depend
for the handling of your affairs in the event of your
incapacity or death to take the test. How will he or she
perform?
The
results of the foregoing tests will, in many cases, serve as a
wake-up call to better organize one's documents, records, and
reports and to effectively communicate with his or her spouse
or others in regard to how they can be effectively accessed if
the need arises.
My
practice involves the planning and administration of estates.
Effective planning and administration both depend, in large
part, upon the ready accessibility of thorough facts based
upon documents, records, and reports in regard to one's assets
and liabilities. All too often I witness circumstances in
which efficient planning or administration are compromised by
the lack of ready availability of necessary documents, records
and reports. Countless hours, in many instances, are spent
searching for, and sorting for relevancy of, paperwork which,
if simply organized and made known in advance to those having
a "need to know" would be hours saved.
As
difficult as it is for many able-bodied and cognitively alert
individuals to efficiently access all of their vital records,
reports and documents, the task becomes even tougher as people
begin to experience a decline in capacity. That task, when it
falls to a successor, in the event of one's incapacity or
death, can become geometrically more difficult.
I
encourage you, therefore, to put on your "to do" list the task
of organizing or updating the organization of your important
documents, records, and reports, and, then, communicating with
your loved ones regarding how your "system" can be accessed if
and when needed. Many books and articles have been written on
how to organize documents, records and reports. The reality is
that almost any system will work as long as it is adhered to
as a matter of habit and known to not only you but, also, your
"back-up" persons so they can access, and benefit from, same
in the event of your incapacity or death.
At
the bottom line, organization beats relative chaos. The task
of becoming organized in the retention of your documents,
records and reports may seem daunting at the outset but, with
patience and a bit of persistence a meaningful system can be
implemented and maintained. The investment of your time and
efforts will pay dividends, many times over, as you update the
planning of your estate and others, ultimately, administer
same for the benefit of you and your loved ones.
Roger Alan
Petzke
Click Photo for Attorney
Profile
|
|
_________________
Looking for a Home?
|
|
___________________
New
zoning and planning legislation enacted
by:
Catherine P. Kaufman
The
Michigan legislature recently approved new zoning and planning
legislation.
PA 12 of 2008 amends the Michigan Zoning Enabling
Act. The
Michigan Zoning Enabling Act (MZEA), adopted in 2006, repealed
the previous separate city/village, township and county zoning
acts, replacing them with one codified statute. The intent underlying
the MZEA was to standardize notice, meeting and other zoning
provisions among Michigan municipalities. PA 12 of 2008 contains
primarily technical revisions to the MZEA. It became
effective on February 29, 2008.
The
Michigan Planning Enabling Act (PA 33 of 2008) was approved by
Governor Granholm on March 13, 2008 and becomes effective
on September 1, 2008.
The MPEA repeals the Municipal Planning Act (PA 285 of
1931), the Township Planning Act (PA 168 of 1959) and the
County Planning Act (PA 282 of 1945), replacing them with one,
unified statute governing planning. As with
the MZEA, the impetus behind the MPEA is the standardization
of planning statues for all municipalities. The MPEA also
contains provisions requiring planning commission review of
subdivision plat (public hearing required) and the
incorporation of any such approval into a municipality's
master plan.
If
you would like additional information on the amended MZEA or
the new MPEA, please contact Catherine Kaufman. You may also review
the new legislation at www.legislature.mi.gov
Click Photo for Attorney
Profile
 |
|
_____________________

The
attorneys at Troff, Petzke and Ammeson enjoy sharing their
technology finds with clients. One such little gem can be
found with www.jott.com.
Jott converts your voice into emails and text messages. Simply
sign up for Jott and enter your email, text messaging and
other addresses, along with you authorized phones. Then call
Jott and dictate a message. The message is sent to the emails
or phones you have selected. It is efficient and really quite
easy to use. Although the voice recognition is nowhere
perfect, it is satisfactory for short messages.
All
in all, Jott Networks operates a voice-to-text service that
makes staying organized and in touch easy. Jott allows
consumers to easily and safely send emails and text messages,
set reminders, organize lists, and post to web services with
their voice. Since its introduction in late 2006, Jott has
made voice transcription accessible to anyone with a cell
phone.
Jott
also integrates with links created by third parties and
third-party application, which incorporate the Jott Service
via Application Programming Interfaces.
Although
Jott disclaims respsibility and liability for the
availability, timeliness, security or reliability of the
service, it currently offers its service free.
Life
is busy. Talk to Jott
|
 |
|
_____________________

GREAT
LAKES UPDATE
2007
was a difficult year for Great Lakes water levels. According to the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers at Detroit, Lakes Superior, Michigan
and Huron are presently in the longest span of below-average
water level since World War I. In fact, in August and
September, Lake Superior broke records for low water levels
that had stood for more than 80 years. However, well-above
average precipitation in the succeeding months raised Lake
Superior by 9 inches.
The other Great Lakes experienced below-average, but
fortunately not record-setting, water levels in
2007.
Above-average
precipitation in February, 2008 in the basins of all of the
Great Lakes except Superior contributed to significant rises
in the water levels of those Lakes. In best shape are
Lakes Erie and Ontario, which are currently above their
long-term average water levels, and at or above their water
levels at this time last year. Lake Superior is a
mixed story: its water level is more than half a foot higher
than this time last year, but it is below its long-term
average water level.
Finally, Lakes Michigan and Huron are a few inches
lower than this time last year, and below their long-term
average levels.
All
of the Great Lakes are projected to rise through April - 2 to
3 inches in Lakes Superior, Michigan, Huron, and Erie, and 5
inches in Lake Ontario.
Over the summer, Lake Superior is projected to stay
above last year's water levels, while the other lakes are
expected to remain at, or fall below, their levels of a year
ago. Lake St.
Clair, which connects Lakes Huron and Erie, is presently 6
inches below its level of this time last year. Like Lakes Michigan,
Huron and Erie, it is projected to rise 2 to 3 inches through
April, but remain at, or fall below, its level of a year ago
during the summer. Outflows
to the Great Lakes from the St. Mary's and St. Clair Rivers
were below average for February, but slightly above average
from the Detroit, Niagara and St. Lawrence Rivers.
|
|
_____________________
2008 GAAMPs
The Michigan Department of Agriculture
and the Michigan Commission on Agriculture have developed and
adopted new GAAMPs (Generally Accepted Agricultural and
Management Practices). In particular, the site
selection GAAMPs has been revised. To review the newly revised
GAAMPs, see www.michigan.gov.
For more information on the revised
GAAMPs or assistance with other real estate and agricultural
matters, please contact Jeff Holmstrom or Catherine
Kaufman.
Click Photo for Attorney
Profile
|
|
|
Photo By: Daniel J. Vomastek, local
photographer
Copyright 2006-2008
|
| Greetings!
Tracing
its roots back to 1880, Troff, Petzke & Ammeson has
a long history of serving the legal needs of the people
and businesses of Southwest Michigan. As we begin our
third century in the community, Troff, Petzke &
Ammeson continues to seek innovative ways to better
communicate with our clients as well as improve our
services. Our new periodic newsletter is part of that
ongoing pursuit. We hope you will share with us your
thoughts on this exciting new venture.
If
there are formatting problems or you are having trouble
reading any of the articles, please click here at
TPA
LAW.
| |
|
TITLE
INSURANCE TIPS
by Charlie
F. Ammeson
Title
insurance is a key component in modern real-estate
transactions. Yet the role of title insurance is
frequently misunderstood. The title
company issues owner's title insurance policies which,
subject to exclusions, exceptions and conditions, insure
owners against loss or damage due to:
●
Title being vested other than as stated in the
policy;
●
Defects, liens or encumbrances on title;
●
Unmarketability of title; and
●
Lack of access to and from the land.
It
is the exceptions that cause concern. Unless removed
by the insurer, a owner's policy contains exceptions
for: (a)
rights or claims of parties in possession not shown of
record; (b)
encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes,
shortages in area, and any other matters that would be
disclosed by an accurate survey; (c) easements or
claims of easements not shown by the public records and
existing water, mineral, oil, and exploration
rights; (d)
any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or
material imposed by law and not shown by the public
records;
(e) restrictions on the use of the premises not
shown of record;
and
(f) dower or homestead rights, if any, of the
wife of any individual insured or any individual shown
to be a party in interest. These exceptions are known as
"standard exceptions," which may be deleted by a title
company upon receipt of affidavits, a survey, and any
other items that the title insurer requires.
Tip
#1:Always demand or obtain title insurance.
Nothing
in the law requires title insurance. However, the
idea that a party can do without title insurance because
of a low risk of claims is dangerous. According to the
American Land Title Association (ALTA), in 2005, over
$748 million in claims was paid by title insurers in the
U.S.
Tip
#2:Obtain an expert to review the Title
Commitment.
Title
insurance companies do not necessarily search the entire
chain of title in the public records. Title companies
rely on the Michigan Marketable Record Title Act. More
importantly, you may not understand the listed
exceptions to the policy.
A
survey is generally required to delete the standard
exceptions. For this reason alone, it is often
wise to get a survey. Moreover, title companies
search records only for the property description
provided by the customer. If this description is
incomplete, title to a portion of the property may not
be searched without anyone realizing the omission.
When it comes to land, a picture is indeed worth a
thousand words.
Tip
#3:Get a survey.
Remove as many exceptions as you can.
A
survey is generally required to delete the standard
exceptions. For this reason alone, it is often
wise to get a survey. Moreover, title companies
search records only for the property description
provided by the customer. If this description is
incomplete, title to a portion of the property may not
be searched without anyone realizing the omission.
When it comes to land, a picture is indeed worth a
thousand words.
Tip
#4:Get a proper credit for your existing title
work.
Most
title companies charge a reduced premium for a prior
policy, even if issued by a different insurer. The rates for
most, if not all, title insurers include a lower rate
for policies issued based on a prior title policy,
regardless of which insurer issued the prior
policy. Ask
for a lower "reissue rate," even if a different insurer
issued the prior title policy.
Tip
#5:Get a marked commitment at closing.
Once
a closing occurs, the title company sends documents to
the register of deeds for recording. Depending on the
county, recording could take a few months. Thus, you
should ask the title company to provide you with a
marked title commitment at closing, where the title
company marks its commitment with a pen to:
●
change the effective date of the commitment;
●
delete the word "proposed";
●
change the name of the owner from the seller to the
buyer;
●
indicate that all requirements to the issuance of a
policy have been met; and
●
delete any exceptions to coverage the insurer is willing
and able to delete.
Tip
#6:Pay proper attention to how you title the
property.
Under
the 1992 title insurance policy forms (in use before
2007), the definition of "insured" is the person named
in the policy as an insured and anyone who succeeds to
the interest of the named insured by operation of law,
as distinguished from purchase. Thus, the 1992
forms of title insurance policies do not continue to
insure a grantor who transfers title by quit claim deed
into a grantor trust (unless an additional
insured endorsement is purchased at that time), but do
continue to insure an owner who transfers title into a
trust by a warranty deed.
In
2006, ALTA promulgated new title insurance policy and
endorsement forms. One of the changes in the new owner's
policy is that the definition of "insured" includes a
"grantee of an insured under a deed delivered without
payment of actual valuable consideration conveying the
title (1) if the stock, shares, memberships, or other
equity interests of the grantee are wholly-owned by the
named insured, (2) if the grantee wholly owns the
insured, (3) if the grantee is wholly-owned by an
affiliated entity of the named insured, provided the
affiliated entity and the named insured are wholly-owned
by the same person or entity, or (4) if the grantee is a
trustee or beneficiary of a trust created by a written
instrument established by the insured named in Schedule
A for estate planning purposes." Thus, under the
new ALTA forms, the grantor in a number of conveyances
will continue to be insured under its title insurance
policy notwithstanding the form of deed used.
Tip
#7:Take full advantage of available endorsements;
many are free.
Title
insurance endorsements modify or extend insurance
coverage provided under a title insurance policy. Two of the more
common endorsements include:
●
Comprehensive endorsement (sometimes referred to as
an "ALTA 9"), insuring
against loss or damage resulting from (a) violations of
building or use restrictions; (b) exercise of
rights to remove minerals; (c) encroachments; (d) certain
liens for private assessments; and (e) certain
options or rights of first
refusal. ● Zoning endorsement
(10-15 percent of basic rate). Issuance of
these endorsements requires review of the zoning map and
ordinance, and written confirmation from the
municipality that there are no outstanding zoning
violations.
If rezoning has resulted in the improvements on
the subject property no longer being a conforming use,
an endorsement may be obtained insuring that the
structure is a permitted non-conforming use. To do so, the
title insurer will require written confirmation from the
municipality that the use is lawful, based on a
grandfather clause in the zoning ordinance.
|
MICHIGAN BEEFS UP RESIDENTIAL
CONTRACTOR LICENSING REQUIREMENTS AND
PENALTIES
by Stephen W.
Smith
Residential
contractors doing work in Michigan should be aware of
several recent changes to state statutes governing
residential building and residential maintenance and
alteration contracting licenses.
Beefed-Up
License Requirements
Requirements
for the licenses held by corporate entities have been
expanded by the recent legislative changes. In addition to
applying to corporations, partnerships and associations,
the licensing statutes now expressly apply to limited
liability companies too. Moreover, there
is a new requirement that the persons who serve as the
qualifying officer for their entity's license must now
also maintain a license in their individual capacity as
well.
Finally, the revised statutes prohibit
individuals and qualifying officers
from imposing a lien on real property if they were not
properly licensed during the performance of the contract
or work.
Beefed-Up
Education Requirements
The
Legislature has also added several new rules and
requirements for obtaining and renewing residential
building and residential maintenance and alteration
contracting licenses. A new section
added to the licensing statutes requires first-time
applicants to complete a pre-licensure course of
study. In
addition, beginning this year, those already licensed
are required to annually take continuing competency
courses, and to
maintain documentation of their continuing education
activities for at least 5 years. Finally,
starting with the license cycle after December 21, 2007,
residential builder and residential maintenance and
alteration contractor licenses issued by the State will
be good for a period of 3 years.
Beefed-Up
Penalties
Apparently
seeking to crack down on unlicensed individuals and
entities doing work in Michigan, the Legislature has
raised the penalties for those caught undertaking
residential building and residential maintenance and
alteration contracting without a proper license. The penalties
for a first offense, which previously consisted of a
maximum fine of $500 and/or up to 90 days in jail, have
now increased to a fine of $5,000 to $25,000 and/or up
to 1 year in jail.
Similarly, the penalties for subsequent licensing
offenses have been raised from the previous maximum fine
of $1,000 and/or up to a year of jail time to a fine of
$5,000 to $25,000 and/or up to 2 years in jail. The Legislature
has also made licensing offenses that cause death or
serious injury a felony, punishable by a fine of $5,000
to $25,000 and/or up to 4 years in jail. Those who aid or
abet others in undertaking residential building and
residential maintenance and alteration contracting
without a proper license are themselves now subject to
administrative penalties, including the loss of their
own license and a fine of up to $10,000.
Anyone
seeking legal assistance with these and other laws
impacting contractors are encouraged to contact Troff,
Petzke & Ammeson.
ssmith@tpalaw.com
Click Photo for
Attorney Profile |
DEEDING REAL PROPERTY TO CHILDREN
by: Ben Schwartz
Parents
regularly call our office inquiring about conveying real
estate to a child.
Sometimes this will involve the parent desiring
to relinquish title entirely to a child; alternatively a
parent may desire to merely add a child to title to the
property.
The property may be the parent's principle
dwelling, or possibly a second vacation home. In all cases, I
urge these clients to proceed with caution and evaluate
with us some of the unforeseen and undesirable
consequences that can result from what otherwise may
seem as simply a desire by a parent to either gift real
estate to a child, or in the case of adding a child to
the title, a desire to avoid probate administration as
to the property by passing title on to the child upon
the death of the parent.
In
the context of adding children to the title of their
parents' property the client should discuss with their
real estate attorney or estate planning attorney several
issues:
There
is the issue of losing control over the ownership
of the property, as in the event of a parent desiring to
sell the property where the child will need to
participate in the sale and sign the deed.
Second,
joint property between a parent and less than all of his
or her children, especially if the ownership is
inconsistent with the terms of the parent's will or
trust, can also create post-death issues of whether the
jointly owned asset was so titled for survivorship
purposes, or for convenience purposes only.
Another
concern we have with intergenerational joint property is
the exposure of what was the parent's property to the
creditors of the child.
There
is also the potential of adverse tax consequences. While
property that is purchased by a parent and sold by a
surviving joint tenant/child after the death of the
joint tenant/parent would have as its basis the stepped
up fair market value of the property at the date of the
joint tenant/parent's death, property sold before the
death of the joint tenant/parent would not. In many cases
adult children are in a higher tax bracket then their
aging parents, and hence a sale of an asset jointly
titled between parent and child during the remaining
life of the parent will result in a higher tax
liability.
Therefore, the consequences of a child taking
title to property during the parent's lifetime, and then
selling the property, as opposed to inheriting the
property from the parent, and then selling it, has
significant tax consequences.
The
situation involving a parent's personal residence also
deserves special attention. If the parent
owning property alone were to sell the property before
death, the parent, assuming the property qualified,
could exclude income up to $250,000 of gain. Conversely, if
the parent created a joint tenancy in regard to that
residence with a child, and the property is sold during
the parent's lifetime, the benefit of that exclusion
would apply only to the parent's prorata (50%) share of
the gain.
Where the child did not use the property as a
residence, the child's 50% share of the gain will not be
excluded from the child's income.
There
are also property tax consequences of any transfer of
ownership of real property from a parent to a
child. In
the situation where the parent elects not to form a
joint ownership with a child, but elects to deed
property to a child outright say as a gift, there will
be an uncapping of the taxable value of the property
leading to the property being reassessed by the local
assessor, and the potential of substantially increased
property taxes.
Conversely,
while creating a joint tenancy between a parent and
child will not cause an "uncapping" again, for the
reasons discussed above, creating such a joint tenancy
may have other unintended or undesirable
consequences.
Finally,
as with any deed conveyance, there may be property
transfer tax consequences. Moreover,
depending on whether or not the child intends on using
the property as a residence, the availability of the
homestead property tax exemption needs to be
analyzed.
Because
this article is not intended to discuss all of the
issues pertaining to transfers of real estate by parents
to children, it is recommended that any parent
contemplating conveying real property to a child, or
even adding a child to the title of property; consult an
attorney with experience in the areas of real estate law
or estate planning.
Click Photo for Attorney
Profile |
|
Limited
Liability Companies and Your Second
Home
by
Brian
P. McMahon
If
you own a second home, a vacation home, vacant or rental
property, it should be owned by a limited liability
company ("LLC"). A word of caution, a LLC is
usually not appropriate for ownership of your principal
residence because you will likely lose your Principal
Residence Exemption (formerly known as the Homestead
Exemption). Because this Exemption is not
available for second homes, vacation homes, vacant
property or property rented to others it is not a factor
in deciding whether to use a LLC to own these types of
properties.
A
limited liability company is a form of entity that
provides the entity owner with the same, and in some
circumstances more, personal liability protection than
the more common s-corporation. However, unlike
s-corporations, a LLC, specifically a "single member
limited liability company", can be formed in a manner
that is the same as if you owned the property in your
individual name. That is, you will not incur any
additional taxes, you do not have to file any tax return
for the entity and you do not have to have any
meetings. This is true for rental properties that
generate "passive income" (i.e. rent) as well.
Except for having to file an Annual Report and pay the
State of Michigan a $25.00 a year fee, LLCs are
basically "form and forget" entities. But it is
very important they are formed and the property is
transferred into them by an attorney that is
knowledgeable in this area of the law. There are
certain pitfalls that need to be considered, not the
least of which is making sure your title insurance and
property insurance are properly transferred into the
name of the LLC.
When
it comes to second homes or vacation homes, LLCs really
shine. Not only do LLCs provide limited liability
protection for your personal assets or trust assets
while you are alive, they are a very effective estate
planning tool. LLCs are useful in estate planning
in many ways including being an excellent method of
maintaining parity between a husband's and wife's
revocable trusts (also called "Living Trusts") and by
providing a method of reducing your "gross estate" for
federal death tax purposes without giving up
control over the property. But even better,
perhaps, is the fact that they provide a method of
making it more likely your second home or vacation home
"stays in the family" and that the use and expenses
of the second home or vacation home and payment for
its expenses are shared, equally or in any other manner
you choose, between the beneficiaries of your estate
plan. These benefits having the obvious result of
reducing the chance for family discourse after your
death.
If
you are interested in learning more about limited
liability companies for use in your business or estate
plan, please contact:
.

Click Photo for
Attorney Profile
|
|
LEGAL NOTICE
The
Troff, Petzke & Ammeson Newsletter is published as a
free service to our clients and friends. The articles in
our Newsletter are for general information and cannot be
relied upon as legal advice or opinion. It is simply not
possible to provide competent legal advice without
knowledge of the specific facts attendant to any given
situation.
Therefore, if you have questions regarding an
article in our Newsletter you are encouraged to contact
the author to discuss the topic further.
| |
| |