THE LAW FIRM OF

TROFF · PETZKE · AMMESON 
 

811 Ship St., Suite 202, St. Joseph, MI 49085

269-983-0161

                                                                                                                                                   
 

Spring Newsletter April 2008
In This Issue
The Importance of Organized Record Retention (Roger A. Petzke)
Title Insurance Tips (Charles F. Ammeson)
Michigan Beefs Up Residential Contractor...Licensing Requirements and Penalties (Stephen W. Smith)
Deeding Real Property to Children (Ben Schwartz)
Limited Liability Companies and Your Second Home (Brian P. McMahon)
 

Cartoon
 

THE IMPORTANCE OF ORGANIZED RECORD RETENTION

THE FOLLOWING IS A TEST OF YOUR EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS SYSTEM:

First, start a timer.

Next, as quickly as you can, retrieve the following:

(1) Your last three federal income tax returns;

(2) The deed to your home, your most recent property tax bill, your mortgage, and evidence of the present balance of the indebtedness secured by that mortgage;

(3) Your savings account books, your checkbook registers, your certificates of deposit and your most recent monthly bank account statements;

(4) Your stock certificates and the most recent quarterly statements in regard to your brokerage accounts and mutual funds;

(5) All policies of insurance on your life, home, and motor vehicles; and

(6) All of your unpaid bills.

Next, stop the timer. How did you do?

For those of you who are satisfied that you "passed" the test I urge you to re-take the test during the height of your next bout of the flu or after having been sleep deprived or heavily medicated for several days. Will you do as well?

Finally, ask your spouse or the other person upon whom you would depend for the handling of your affairs in the event of your incapacity or death to take the test. How will he or she perform?

The results of the foregoing tests will, in many cases, serve as a wake-up call to better organize one's documents, records, and reports and to effectively communicate with his or her spouse or others in regard to how they can be effectively accessed if the need arises.

My practice involves the planning and administration of estates. Effective planning and administration both depend, in large part, upon the ready accessibility of thorough facts based upon documents, records, and reports in regard to one's assets and liabilities. All too often I witness circumstances in which efficient planning or administration are compromised by the lack of ready availability of necessary documents, records and reports. Countless hours, in many instances, are spent searching for, and sorting for relevancy of, paperwork which, if simply organized and made known in advance to those having a "need to know" would be hours saved.

As difficult as it is for many able-bodied and cognitively alert individuals to efficiently access all of their vital records, reports and documents, the task becomes even tougher as people begin to experience a decline in capacity. That task, when it falls to a successor, in the event of one's incapacity or death, can become geometrically more difficult.

I encourage you, therefore, to put on your "to do" list the task of organizing or updating the organization of your important documents, records, and reports, and, then, communicating with your loved ones regarding how your "system" can be accessed if and when needed. Many books and articles have been written on how to organize documents, records and reports. The reality is that almost any system will work as long as it is adhered to as a matter of habit and known to not only you but, also, your "back-up" persons so they can access, and benefit from, same in the event of your incapacity or death.

At the bottom line, organization beats relative chaos. The task of becoming organized in the retention of your documents, records and reports may seem daunting at the outset but, with patience and a bit of persistence a meaningful system can be implemented and maintained. The investment of your time and efforts will pay dividends, many times over, as you update the planning of your estate and others, ultimately, administer same for the benefit of you and your loved ones.

Roger Alan Petzke

Roger Alan Petzke
 
Click Photo for Attorney Profile
 
_________________
 
Looking for a Home?
 

 
___________________
 

New zoning and planning legislation enacted

by: Catherine P. Kaufman

 

The Michigan legislature recently approved new zoning and planning legislation.   PA 12 of 2008 amends the Michigan Zoning Enabling Act.   The Michigan Zoning Enabling Act (MZEA), adopted in 2006, repealed the previous separate city/village, township and county zoning acts, replacing them with one codified statute.  The intent underlying the MZEA was to standardize notice, meeting and other zoning provisions among Michigan municipalities.  PA 12 of 2008 contains primarily technical revisions to the MZEA.   It became effective on February 29, 2008.

 

The Michigan Planning Enabling Act (PA 33 of 2008) was approved by Governor Granholm on March 13, 2008  and becomes effective on September 1, 2008.  The MPEA repeals the Municipal Planning Act (PA 285 of 1931), the Township Planning Act (PA 168 of 1959) and the County Planning Act (PA 282 of 1945), replacing them with one, unified statute governing planning.    As with the MZEA, the impetus behind the MPEA is the standardization of planning statues for all municipalities.   The MPEA also contains provisions requiring planning commission review of subdivision plat (public hearing required) and the incorporation of any such approval into a municipality's master plan. 

 

If you would like additional information on the amended MZEA or the new MPEA, please contact Catherine Kaufman.  You may also review the new legislation at www.legislature.mi.gov

 

Click Photo for Attorney Profile

 

Katie


Quick Links
_____________________
 
Jott Logo

 
 

The attorneys at Troff, Petzke and Ammeson enjoy sharing their technology finds with clients. One such little gem can be found with www.jott.com. Jott converts your voice into emails and text messages. Simply sign up for Jott and enter your email, text messaging and other addresses, along with you authorized phones. Then call Jott and dictate a message. The message is sent to the emails or phones you have selected. It is efficient and really quite easy to use. Although the voice recognition is nowhere perfect, it is satisfactory for short messages.

 

All in all, Jott Networks operates a voice-to-text service that makes staying organized and in touch easy. Jott allows consumers to easily and safely send emails and text messages, set reminders, organize lists, and post to web services with their voice. Since its introduction in late 2006, Jott has made voice transcription accessible to anyone with a cell phone.

 

Jott also integrates with links created by third parties and third-party application, which incorporate the Jott Service via Application Programming Interfaces.

 

Although Jott disclaims respsibility and liability for the availability, timeliness, security or reliability of the service, it currently offers its service free.

 

Life is busy. Talk to Jott

 

 
Join Our Mailing List
 

_____________________

 

Great Lakes

 

GREAT LAKES UPDATE

 

2007 was a difficult year for Great Lakes water levels.  According to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers at Detroit, Lakes Superior, Michigan and Huron are presently in the longest span of below-average water level since World War I.  In fact, in August and September, Lake Superior broke records for low water levels that had stood for more than 80 years.  However, well-above average precipitation in the succeeding months raised Lake Superior by 9 inches.  The other Great Lakes experienced below-average, but fortunately not record-setting, water levels in 2007.

 

Above-average precipitation in February, 2008 in the basins of all of the Great Lakes except Superior contributed to significant rises in the water levels of those Lakes.  In best shape are Lakes Erie and Ontario, which are currently above their long-term average water levels, and at or above their water levels at this time last year.  Lake Superior is a mixed story: its water level is more than half a foot higher than this time last year, but it is below its long-term average water level.  Finally, Lakes Michigan and Huron are a few inches lower than this time last year, and below their long-term average levels.

 

All of the Great Lakes are projected to rise through April - 2 to 3 inches in Lakes Superior, Michigan, Huron, and Erie, and 5 inches in Lake Ontario.  Over the summer, Lake Superior is projected to stay above last year's water levels, while the other lakes are expected to remain at, or fall below, their levels of a year ago.  Lake St. Clair, which connects Lakes Huron and Erie, is presently 6 inches below its level of this time last year.  Like Lakes Michigan, Huron and Erie, it is projected to rise 2 to 3 inches through April, but remain at, or fall below, its level of a year ago during the summer.   Outflows to the Great Lakes from the St. Mary's and St. Clair Rivers were below average for February, but slightly above average from the Detroit, Niagara and St. Lawrence Rivers.

 

 

_____________________
 
GAAMPS LOGO
 

2008 GAAMPs

 

The Michigan Department of Agriculture and the Michigan Commission on Agriculture have developed and adopted new GAAMPs (Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices).   In particular, the site selection GAAMPs has been revised. To review the newly revised GAAMPs, see www.michigan.gov

 

For more information on the revised GAAMPs or assistance with other real estate and agricultural matters, please contact Jeff Holmstrom or Catherine Kaufman.  

 

 
Click Photo for Attorney Profile
 
__________________
Join Our Mailing List
     Silver Beach
 
 
Photo By: Daniel J. Vomastek, local photographer
Copyright 2006-2008
To order or see more photos go to www.lakeshoreclick.com
 
Greetings!
 

Tracing its roots back to 1880, Troff, Petzke & Ammeson has a long history of serving the legal needs of the people and businesses of Southwest Michigan. As we begin our third century in the community, Troff, Petzke & Ammeson continues to seek innovative ways to better communicate with our clients as well as improve our services. Our new periodic newsletter is part of that ongoing pursuit. We hope you will share with us your thoughts on this exciting new venture.

 

 

If there are formatting problems or you are having trouble reading any of the articles, please click here at TPA LAW.

 

TITLE INSURANCE TIPS

 

by
Charlie F. Ammeson

 

Title insurance is a key component in modern real-estate transactions. Yet the role of title insurance is frequently misunderstood.  The title company issues owner's title insurance policies which, subject to exclusions, exceptions and conditions, insure owners against loss or damage due to:

 

●    Title being vested other than as stated in the policy;

●    Defects, liens or encumbrances on title;

●    Unmarketability of title; and

●    Lack of access to and from the land.

 

It is the exceptions that cause concern.  Unless removed by the insurer, a owner's policy contains exceptions for:  (a) rights or claims of parties in possession not shown of record;  (b) encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, shortages in area, and any other matters that would be disclosed by an accurate survey;  (c) easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records and existing water, mineral, oil, and exploration rights;  (d) any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material imposed by law and not shown by the public records;  (e) restrictions on the use of the premises not shown of record;  and  (f) dower or homestead rights, if any, of the wife of any individual insured or any individual shown to be a party in interest. These exceptions are known as "standard exceptions," which may be deleted by a title company upon receipt of affidavits, a survey, and any other items that the title insurer requires.

 

Tip #1:Always demand or obtain title insurance.

 

Nothing in the law requires title insurance.  However, the idea that a party can do without title insurance because of a low risk of claims is dangerous.  According to the American Land Title Association (ALTA), in 2005, over $748 million in claims was paid by title insurers in the U.S.

 

Tip #2:Obtain an expert to review the Title Commitment.

 

Title insurance companies do not necessarily search the entire chain of title in the public records.  Title companies rely on the Michigan Marketable Record Title Act.  More importantly, you may not understand the listed exceptions to the policy.

A survey is generally required to delete the standard exceptions.  For this reason alone, it is often wise to get a survey.  Moreover, title companies search records only for the property description provided by the customer.  If this description is incomplete, title to a portion of the property may not be searched without anyone realizing the omission.  When it comes to land, a picture is indeed worth a thousand words.

 

Tip #3:Get a survey.  Remove as many exceptions as you can.

 

A survey is generally required to delete the standard exceptions.  For this reason alone, it is often wise to get a survey.  Moreover, title companies search records only for the property description provided by the customer.  If this description is incomplete, title to a portion of the property may not be searched without anyone realizing the omission.  When it comes to land, a picture is indeed worth a thousand words.

 

Tip #4:Get a proper credit for your existing title work.

 

Most title companies charge a reduced premium for a prior policy, even if issued by a different insurer.  The rates for most, if not all, title insurers include a lower rate for policies issued based on a prior title policy, regardless of which insurer issued the prior policy.  Ask for a lower "reissue rate," even if a different insurer issued the prior title policy.

 

Tip #5:Get a marked commitment at closing.

 

Once a closing occurs, the title company sends documents to the register of deeds for recording.  Depending on the county, recording could take a few months. Thus, you should ask the title company to provide you with a marked title commitment at closing, where the title company marks its commitment with a pen to:

 

●  change the effective date of the commitment;

●  delete the word "proposed";

●  change the name of the owner from the seller to the buyer;

●  indicate that all requirements to the issuance of a policy have been met; and

●  delete any exceptions to coverage the insurer is willing and able to delete.

 

Tip #6:Pay proper attention to how you title the property.

 

Under the 1992 title insurance policy forms (in use before 2007), the definition of "insured" is the person named in the policy as an insured and anyone who succeeds to the interest of the named insured by operation of law, as distinguished from purchase.  Thus, the 1992 forms of title insurance policies do not continue to insure a grantor who transfers title by quit claim deed into a grantor trust (unless an  additional insured endorsement is purchased at that time), but do continue to insure an owner who transfers title into a trust by a warranty deed.

 

In 2006, ALTA promulgated new title insurance policy and endorsement forms. One of the changes in the new owner's policy is that the definition of "insured" includes a "grantee of an insured under a deed delivered without payment of actual valuable consideration conveying the title (1) if the stock, shares, memberships, or other equity interests of the grantee are wholly-owned by the named insured, (2) if the grantee wholly owns the insured, (3) if the grantee is wholly-owned by an affiliated entity of the named insured, provided the affiliated entity and the named insured are wholly-owned by the same person or entity, or (4) if the grantee is a trustee or beneficiary of a trust created by a written instrument established by the insured named in Schedule A for estate planning purposes."  Thus, under the new ALTA forms, the grantor in a number of conveyances will continue to be insured under its title insurance policy notwithstanding the form of deed used.

 

Tip #7:Take full advantage of available endorsements; many
are free.

 

Title insurance endorsements modify or extend insurance coverage provided under a title insurance policy.  Two of the more common endorsements include:

●    Comprehensive endorsement (sometimes referred to as an   "ALTA    9"), insuring against loss or damage resulting from (a) violations of building or use restrictions;  (b) exercise of rights to remove minerals; (c) encroachments;  (d) certain liens for private assessments;  and (e) certain options or rights of first refusal.
●    Zoning endorsement (10-15 percent of basic rate).  Issuance of these endorsements requires review of the zoning map and ordinance, and written confirmation from the municipality that there are no outstanding zoning violations.  If rezoning has resulted in the improvements on the subject property no longer being a conforming use, an endorsement may be obtained insuring that the structure is a permitted non-conforming use.  To do so, the title insurer will require written confirmation from the municipality that the use is lawful, based on a grandfather clause in the zoning ordinance.

 

                                                                                    

Charlie F. Ammeson           cammeson@tpalaw.com

 
       Click Photo for Attorney Profile
 

 

MICHIGAN BEEFS UP RESIDENTIAL CONTRACTOR LICENSING REQUIREMENTS AND PENALTIES

 

by Stephen W. Smith

 

Residential contractors doing work in Michigan should be aware of several recent changes to state statutes governing residential building and residential maintenance and alteration contracting licenses.

 

Beefed-Up License Requirements

 

Requirements for the licenses held by corporate entities have been expanded by the recent legislative changes.  In addition to applying to corporations, partnerships and associations, the licensing statutes now expressly apply to limited liability companies too.  Moreover, there is a new requirement that the persons who serve as the qualifying officer for their entity's license must now also maintain a license in their individual capacity as well.  Finally, the revised statutes prohibit individuals and qualifying officers from imposing a lien on real property if they were not properly licensed during the performance of the contract or work.

 

Beefed-Up Education Requirements

 

The Legislature has also added several new rules and requirements for obtaining and renewing residential building and residential maintenance and alteration contracting licenses.  A new section added to the licensing statutes requires first-time applicants to complete a pre-licensure course of study.  In addition, beginning this year, those already licensed are required to annually take continuing competency courses, and to maintain documentation of their continuing education activities for at least 5 years.  Finally, starting with the license cycle after December 21, 2007, residential builder and residential maintenance and alteration contractor licenses issued by the State will be good for a period of 3 years.

 

Beefed-Up Penalties

 

Apparently seeking to crack down on unlicensed individuals and entities doing work in Michigan, the Legislature has raised the penalties for those caught undertaking residential building and residential maintenance and alteration contracting without a proper license.  The penalties for a first offense, which previously consisted of a maximum fine of $500 and/or up to 90 days in jail, have now increased to a fine of $5,000 to $25,000 and/or up to 1 year in jail.  Similarly, the penalties for subsequent licensing offenses have been raised from the previous maximum fine of $1,000 and/or up to a year of jail time to a fine of $5,000 to $25,000 and/or up to 2 years in jail.  The Legislature has also made licensing offenses that cause death or serious injury a felony, punishable by a fine of $5,000 to $25,000 and/or up to 4 years in jail.  Those who aid or abet others in undertaking residential building and residential maintenance and alteration contracting without a proper license are themselves now subject to administrative penalties, including the loss of their own license and a fine of up to $10,000.

 

Anyone seeking legal assistance with these and other laws impacting contractors are encouraged to contact Troff, Petzke & Ammeson.

 

 

           

ssmith@tpalaw.com Steve Smith

 

      Click Photo for Attorney Profile

 

 

DEEDING REAL PROPERTY TO CHILDRENGrandmother and children

 

by: Ben Schwartz

 

Parents regularly call our office inquiring about conveying real estate to a child.  Sometimes this will involve the parent desiring to relinquish title entirely to a child; alternatively a parent may desire to merely add a child to title to the property.  The property may be the parent's principle dwelling, or possibly a second vacation home.  In all cases, I urge these clients to proceed with caution and evaluate with us some of the unforeseen and undesirable consequences that can result from what otherwise may seem as simply a desire by a parent to either gift real estate to a child, or in the case of adding a child to the title, a desire to avoid probate administration as to the property by passing title on to the child upon the death of the parent.

 

In the context of adding children to the title of their parents' property the client should discuss with their real estate attorney or estate planning attorney several issues:

 

There is the issue of losing control over the ownership of the property, as in the event of a parent desiring to sell the property where the child will need to participate in the sale and sign the deed.

 

Second, joint property between a parent and less than all of his or her children, especially if the ownership is inconsistent with the terms of the parent's will or trust, can also create post-death issues of whether the jointly owned asset was so titled for survivorship purposes, or for convenience purposes only.

 

Another concern we have with intergenerational joint property is the exposure of what was the parent's property to the creditors of the child.

 

There is also the potential of adverse tax consequences. While property that is purchased by a parent and sold by a surviving joint tenant/child after the death of the joint tenant/parent would have as its basis the stepped up fair market value of the property at the date of the joint tenant/parent's death, property sold before the death of the joint tenant/parent would not.  In many cases adult children are in a higher tax bracket then their aging parents, and hence a sale of an asset jointly titled between parent and child during the remaining life of the parent will result in a higher tax liability.  Therefore, the consequences of a child taking title to property during the parent's lifetime, and then selling the property, as opposed to inheriting the property from the parent, and then selling it, has significant tax consequences.

 

The situation involving a parent's personal residence also deserves special attention.  If the parent owning property alone were to sell the property before death, the parent, assuming the property qualified, could exclude income up to $250,000 of gain.  Conversely, if the parent created a joint tenancy in regard to that residence with a child, and the property is sold during the parent's lifetime, the benefit of that exclusion would apply only to the parent's prorata (50%) share of the gain.  Where the child did not use the property as a residence, the child's 50% share of the gain will not be excluded from the child's income.

 

There are also property tax consequences of any transfer of ownership of real property from a parent to a child.  In the situation where the parent elects not to form a joint ownership with a child, but elects to deed property to a child outright say as a gift, there will be an uncapping of the taxable value of the property leading to the property being reassessed by the local assessor, and the potential of substantially increased property taxes. 

 

 

Conversely, while creating a joint tenancy between a parent and child will not cause an "uncapping" again, for the reasons discussed above, creating such a joint tenancy may have other unintended or undesirable consequences.

 

Finally, as with any deed conveyance, there may be property transfer tax consequences.   Moreover, depending on whether or not the child intends on using the property as a residence, the availability of the homestead property tax exemption needs to be analyzed.

 

Because this article is not intended to discuss all of the issues pertaining to transfers of real estate by parents to children, it is recommended that any parent contemplating conveying real property to a child, or even adding a child to the title of property; consult an attorney with experience in the areas of real estate law or estate planning.

 

 

              Click Photo for Attorney Profile

Limited Liability Companies and Your Second Home

by

Brian P. McMahon

 

If you own a second home, a vacation home, vacant or rental property, it should be owned by a limited liability company ("LLC").  A word of caution, a LLC is usually not appropriate for ownership of your principal residence because you will likely lose your Principal Residence Exemption (formerly known as the Homestead Exemption).  Because this Exemption is not available for second homes, vacation homes, vacant property or property rented to others it is not a factor in deciding whether to use a LLC to own these types of properties.   

 

A limited liability company is a form of entity that provides the entity owner with the same, and in some circumstances more, personal liability protection than the more common s-corporation.  However, unlike s-corporations, a LLC, specifically a "single member limited liability company", can be formed in a manner that is the same as if you owned the property in your individual name.  That is, you will not incur any additional taxes, you do not have to file any tax return for the entity and you do not have to have any meetings.  This is true for rental properties that generate "passive income" (i.e. rent) as well.  Except for having to file an Annual Report and pay the State of Michigan a $25.00 a year fee, LLCs are basically "form and forget" entities.  But it is very important they are formed and the property is transferred into them by an attorney that is knowledgeable in this area of the law.  There are certain pitfalls that need to be considered, not the least of which is making sure your title insurance and property insurance are properly transferred into the name of the LLC.

 

When it comes to second homes or vacation homes, LLCs really shine.  Not only do LLCs provide limited liability protection for your personal assets or trust assets while you are alive, they are a very effective estate planning tool.  LLCs are useful in estate planning in many ways including being an excellent method of maintaining parity between a husband's and wife's revocable trusts (also called "Living Trusts") and by providing a method of reducing your "gross estate" for federal death tax purposes without giving up control over the property.  But even better, perhaps, is the fact that they provide a method of making it more likely your second home or vacation home "stays in the family" and that the use and expenses of the second home or vacation home and payment for its expenses are shared, equally or in any other manner you choose, between the beneficiaries of your estate plan.  These benefits having the obvious result of reducing the chance for family discourse after your death.

 

If you are interested in learning more about limited liability companies for use in your business or estate plan, please contact:

 

. Brian P. McMahon

 
          bmcmahon@tpalaw.com
 

        Click Photo for Attorney Profile

LEGAL NOTICE

The Troff, Petzke & Ammeson Newsletter is published as a free service to our clients and friends. The articles in our Newsletter are for general information and cannot be relied upon as legal advice or opinion.  It is simply not possible to provide competent legal advice without knowledge of the specific facts attendant to any given situation.  Therefore, if you have questions regarding an article in our Newsletter you are encouraged to contact the author to discuss the topic further.

 

Safe Unsubscribe
This email was sent to bmcmahon@tpalaw.com, by tpalaw@tpalaw.com
Troff, Petzke & Ammeson | 811 Ship Street, Suite 202 | Saint Joseph | MI | 49085