|
RISKS INVOLVED IN ACQUIRING BUSINESS ASSETS
Know the risks
by
Brian P. McMahon, Esq.
The two most common ways of acquiring business assets
(fn 1) are to purchase the shares of stock of the corporation that owns the
business assets ("stock purchase agreement"), and to
purchase the
business assets, only, from the corporation that owns them ("asset purchase
agreement").
1.)
Stock Purchase Agreement.
In a stock purchase agreement, the buyer purchases all of the
shares of stock of the corporation from its current shareholders.
In effect, "stepping into the shoes" of the current shareholders.
This method of acquiring business assets is significantly
less common than an asset purchase agreement method.
The reason it is less common is because there is a high risk of
acquiring unknown liabilities of the corporation.
For example:
A.
Prior to the acquisition of the business, the corporation’s
president signs a binding contract to purchase a product exclusively
from a third party for three years.
During negotiations for the sale of shares of stock there is no mention of the contract because
the selling shareholder(s) don’t think to mention it or simply forgot there was a
contract signed. After the
sale is completed and before the three year contract has expired, the
new shareholder(s) finds the same product available from a
different supplier for 50% less than they have been paying this
third party. In this
circumstance, the third party will have the right to enforce its
contract directly against the corporation even though the contract was
signed before the acquisition and/or the contract was unknown to the
new shareholder(s).
B.
Prior to the acquisition of the business, the corporation
manufactures and sells a product to a third party.
Some time after the sale of the shares of stock to the new
shareholders, the
third party is injured by the product because of a defect attributable
to the way it was manufactured.
In this circumstance, the third party will have the right to sue
the acquired corporation even though the product was not manufactured
while owned by the new shareholders.
That is not to say stock
purchase agreements are always bad.
Sometimes there is a tax advantage to using a stock purchase
agreement. For example, the
new buyer may be able to “carry forward” the “net operating losses” of
the corporation to offset income from the corporation after it is
acquired or other
income of the new shareholder(s). Also,
many of the risks associated with acquiring “the history” of the
corporation can be avoided by drafting purchase agreements that contain
indemnification provisions and by performing detailed “due diligence”
before the acquisition in an attempt to discover all risks.
However, the tax advantage seldom outweighs the cost of
performing the level of due diligence necessary and/or the risk of
not being able to discover all the liabilities.
2.)
Asset Purchase Agreement.
In an asset purchase agreement, the buyer (usually a newly
created corporation) acquires only the assets of the corporation
not the shares of stock of the corporation that owns the business
assets. However, acquiring business assets using an asset
purchase agreement is not without risk even if the agreement
specifically says “buyer assumes no liabilities.”
For example, if the buyer of the business assets is determined to
be a “successor” of the corporation that sold its assets to the buyer, the
buyer will be liable for certain taxes
the corporation selling the business assets failed to pay including sales tax, use tax,
withholding tax and unemployment taxes.
The exposure to liability for taxes can be easily avoided by
including a requirement in the asset purchase agreement that the seller
obtain a “Conditional Tax Clearance” (which can only be obtained after
the actual sale); and by requiring a portion of the purchase price be
escrowed until the Certificate is delivered to secure payment for any
taxes that may be due. It is
also important to make sure there are no liens against the
assets.
Unfortunately this
simple solution is often overlooked or unknown.
One scenario in which it is commonly overlooked is when the
acquisition of the business assets includes the acquisition of the real
estate on which the business is operated.
All too often the seller and buyer treat the transaction more as
a real estate transaction that just happens to include a business as
well. This is especially
true if the real estate is significantly more valuable than the business
itself. For this reason it is important to make sure the purchase
agreement for any transaction, including a transaction that involves the
sale of real estate as well as a business, addresses the risks mentioned above.
Although it is likely a buyer will have legal recourse against the
seller, lawsuits cost money and sellers may be hard to find and/or not
have money to pay the damages by the time a judgment is obtained.
This article mentions only a few of the many issues
that need to be considered when acquiring the business assets from an
ongoing business..
Footnote 1: The term "business assets" refers
to the assets a business needs to operate. For example, the term
business asset includes a truck that a business needs to deliver the
widgets to market. It does not include "inventory." For
example, the term business assets does not include buying a truck from a
truck dealer.
For more information contact :
Brian P. McMahon

The Troff, Petzke & Ammeson Newsletter is published as a free service to our clients and
friends. The articles in our Newsletter are for general information and cannot
be relied upon as legal advice or opinion.
It is simply not possible to provide competent legal advice
without knowledge of the specific facts attendant to a particular situation.
Therefore,
you are encouraged to contact the author to discuss the topic further before
acting on the information provided herein.
Back to Top
|